Manual vs. Automated NCAA and EADA Reporting: Pros and Cons

NCAA and Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA) reporting are critical annual tasks for university athletics departments. As new technologies emerge that promise to make reporting easier, many institutions find themselves considering whether to maintain their traditional manual reporting processes or transition to automated solutions.

This decision can have far-reaching implications for efficiency, accuracy and strategic planning. We’ll explore the pros and cons of each approach.

Manual NCAA and EADA Reporting

Reporting has been handled manually for many years, so this process is familiar to most institutions. It involves staff members collecting, inputting and compiling data by hand.

While this method does result in a deep understanding of the report since staff need to work closely with the data to complete it, it’s also incredibly time-consuming.

Here are the two biggest pros and cons of manual NCAA and EADA reporting:

Pro: Familiarity and Control
Many long-time staff members have developed extensive knowledge of the manual NCAA and EADA reporting processes over years of experience. This familiarity provides a sense of control and confidence in the accuracy of the final report.

Staff who have been handling the process for years know the nuances of their institution’s data, understand where to find specific information and can quickly spot potential inconsistencies. This level of intuitive understanding can be invaluable in maintaining the integrity of the report.

Con: Time-Consuming Process
However, the comfort of familiarity comes at a significant cost. Our research has shown that manual NCAA and EADA reporting can consume up to 500 hours annually. This extensive time commitment diverts valuable resources from other critical tasks within the athletics department.

Consider the impact: those 500 hours could be spent on strategic planning, fundraising efforts, or improving student-athlete experiences. Instead, they’re dedicated to data entry and compilation — tasks that could potentially be automated.

Pro: Flexibility for Last-Minute Changes
In theory, manual processes allow for easy last-minute adjustments. If new information comes to light or corrections are needed, staff can quickly make changes without navigating complex software systems. This flexibility can be particularly valuable when dealing with late-breaking data or responding to auditor inquiries.

For instance, if a discrepancy in scholarship allocation is discovered just before the submission deadline, manual processes allow for immediate correction without the need to update a mapping table or change a configuration.

Con: Increased Risk of Errors
Despite the best efforts of diligent staff, manual data entry is inherently prone to mistakes. Even small errors can lead to significant discrepancies in the final report, potentially affecting compliance and funding decisions. The risk of error increases with the volume of data and the complexity of calculations involved in NCAA and EADA reporting.

A simple transposition error or a misplaced decimal point could result in substantial misrepresentation of an institution’s athletic program data. These errors not only affect the accuracy of the current report but can also impact year-over-year comparisons and trend analyses.

Automated NCAA and EADA Reporting

Automated systems, like ARENA by James Moore Digital, use software to collect, process and compile data, offering a modern alternative to manual methods. With automation, institutions can build in checks to ensure accuracy, while also consolidating data and making it more accessible to everyone who needs it.

This approach brings its own set of advantages and challenges:

Pro: Significant Time Savings
One of the most compelling advantages of automated reporting is the dramatic reduction in processing time. What once took hundreds of hours can often be accomplished in a fraction of the time, allowing staff to focus on data analysis and strategic decision-making.

ARENA by James Moore Digital can pull data from various sources and perform complex calculations automatically — a process that might take days or weeks with manual methods. This time savings allows athletics department staff to shift their focus from data entry to data interpretation and strategic planning.

Con: Initial Time Investment to Implement
Introducing an automated system does require an initial investment of time to implement the new reporting solution, which may temporarily slow down your processes.

That’s why James Moore offers a comprehensive implementation and training plan to ensure a smooth transition. As for the setup time and upfront investment, the long-term time and cost savings usually far outweigh these early drawbacks.

Pro: Improved Accuracy and Consistency
Automated systems significantly reduce the risk of human error. They use consistent calculation methods and can incorporate built-in validation checks. This ensures more accurate and reliable reports year after year.

For instance, an automated system can flag unusual data points, such as a sudden spike in expenses or a discrepancy in participation numbers — prompting staff to verify the information before it’s included in the final report. This level of consistency and error-checking is difficult to achieve with manual processes and results in improved access to information, streamlined audit process and other benefits.

Con: Potential for Over-Reliance on Technology
As with any new technology adoption, there is a risk that staff may become overly reliant on the automated system. They might overlook or even dismiss the need for human oversight and critical thinking in the reporting process.

This risk can be countered with internal controls. For example, you could set up a system where automated tools handle data processing, while key staff members are trained to interpret results, provide context and perform regular audits.

James Moore can help design a system that balances automation with necessary human oversight, ensuring technology enhances rather than replaces critical thinking.

Considerations for Choosing the Right Approach

When deciding between manual and automated NCAA and EADA reporting, athletics department leaders should consider several key factors:

• Time and resource allocation: How much time could be saved with automation and how could those hours be better utilized?
• Data accuracy needs: How critical is consistent, error-free reporting for your institution and what are the potential consequences of inaccuracies?
• Budget constraints: While automation requires investing in a new tool, it leads to long-term savings. How do these potential savings compare to the cost of maintaining manual processes?
• Staff adaptability: How open is your team to adopting new technologies? What level of training and support would be necessary for a successful transition?

While manual reporting has served many institutions well over the years, the benefits of automation in terms of time savings, accuracy and strategic insights are becoming increasingly clear in today’s data-driven environment.

Automated solutions offer not just efficiency gains but also the potential for deeper analysis and more informed decision-making.

Improve Your NCAA and EADA Reporting Workflows with James Moore Digital

As NCAA and EADA reporting requirements grow more complex, automated solutions offer a path to greater efficiency, accuracy and strategic insight.

For university athletics CFOs looking to streamline their reporting processes, ARENA by James Moore is a game-changing solution that frees up critical resources and improves the reporting quality process.

To learn more about transforming your EADA reporting process, contact James Moore Digital today.

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a James Moore professional. James Moore will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.